DIY SOC or SOC-as-a-Service?: A TCO Analysis by Frost & Sullivan

January 14, 2019 Arctic Wolf Networks

To combat today’s threats, companies of every size need a security operations center (SOC) to ensure their organizations stay safe. Unfortunately, SOCs are very costly and require expensive technology and a team of engineers with security expertise.

Leading consultancy Frost & Sullivan conducted a three-year cost comparison between building an internal SOC (a DIY SOC) or buying a SOC-as-a-service, in this case Arctic Wolf’s AWN CyberSOC™ service. Regardless of their size, organizations save big with SOC-as-a-service, especially SMBs. Just have a look at the following figures:

 

 

The report details the costs associated with:

As the report explains, Arctic Wolf’s SOC-as-a-service includes Concierge Security™ teams of all the security analysts, engineers and managers a SOC requires. The AWN CyberSOC service leverages a cloud-based SIEM with the latest threat intelligence feeds, and also includes vulnerability scanning as well as additional capabilities.

With savings up to 9x, Arctic Wolf’s SOC-as-a-service model is the smart move for many SMEs looking for comprehensive cybersecurity.  To learn more, download the full Frost & Sullivan TCO report.

 

Previous Article
These Numbers Explain Why Companies Seek Managed Security Services
These Numbers Explain Why Companies Seek Managed Security Services

Without a SOC, companies struggle to achieve the comprehensive cybersecurity they need.

Next Article
How to Deal with C-Suite and Boardroom Concerns About Cybersecurity
How to Deal with C-Suite and Boardroom Concerns About Cybersecurity

Executives want SaaS, but they also need security and compliance. Here's how they can get both. 

×

Want cybersecurity updates delivered to your inbox?

First Name
Last Name
Company
!
Thanks for subscribing!
Error - something went wrong!